Against Timocrates
"Against Timocrates" was a speech given by Demosthenes in Athens in which he accused Timocrates of proposing an illegal decree.[1] The speech provides our best evidence about the use of imprisonment as a punishment in Classical Athens.[1]
Timocrates' law would have allowed debtors to the state to go free on providing a surety, rather than being imprisoned until they paid their debts.[2] Democrates' speech criticises this law on the grounds that it would unfairly advantage wealthy citizens at the expense of the poor.[3]
Historical background
The speech can be dated to the summer of 353 BC.[4] A series of events led to the trial. Three Athenians in 355 BC, including Androtion, whilst sailing as ambassadors to Mausolus, the King of Caria, captured a merchant ship near Naucratis, claiming lawful seizure of enemy property.[4] The ambassadors held onto the plunder they received until a commission was appointed into the matter, moved by Euctemon and Diodorus.[4] Euctemon and Diodorus gave information against the two trierarchs who had been commanding the ambassadors' ship.[4] The result was that the ambassadors admitted possession of the money, however Euctemon furthered his investigation and proposed a decree (which was passed) that the trierarchs should be responsible for recovering the money.[4]
Androtion and his supporters in retaliation proposed a graphe paranomon (the charge for proposing an unlawful decree) against Euctemon.[4] Euctemon was acquitted, however Timocrates, a friend of the ambassadors, then proposed his law that any debtor of the state should remain at liberty until the ninth prytany on the condition that they provided a surety.[4] This presumably would have enabled the ambassadors to escape with their plunder.[4] The speech "Against Timocrates" details the graphe paranomon Euctemon and Diodorus brought against Timocrates in retaliation.[4] Diodorus opens the speech. The action of the graphe paranomon suspended the effect of Timocrates' law, and the ambassadors were forced to pay the money.[4] The action against Timocrates however was not halted but pursued.[4]
References
- ^ a b Allen, Danielle (1997). "Imprisonment in Classical Athens". The Classical Quarterly. 47 (1): 124.
- ^ Allen, Danielle (1997). "Imprisonment in Classical Athens". The Classical Quarterly. 47 (1): 132.
- ^ Allen, Danielle (1997). "Imprisonment in Classical Athens". The Classical Quarterly. 47 (1): 133.
- ^ a b c d e f g h i j k Henderson, J (1935). Loeb Classical Library: Demosthenes, Orations, Volume III. MA: Harvard University. pp. 370–371.
External links
- Text of the speech at the Perseus Digital Library
- v
- t
- e
- Olynthiacs 1-2-3
- First Philippic
- On the Peace
- Second Philippic
- On the Halonnesus
- On the Chersonese
- Third Philippic
- Fourth Philippic
- Reply to Philip
- Philip
- On Organisation
- On the Navy Boards
- On the Liberty of the Rhodians
- For the Megalopolitans
- On the Accession of Alexander
- On the Crown
- On the False Embassy
- Against Leptines
- Against Meidias
- Against Androtion
- Against Aristocrates
- Against Timocrates
- Against Aristogeiton 1-2
- Against Aphobus 1-2-3
- Against Ontenor 1-2
- Against Zenothemis
- Against Apatourius
- Against Phormio
- Against Lacritus
- For Phormion
- Against Pantaenetus
- Against Nausimachus and Xenopeithes
- Against Boeotus 1-2
- Against Spudias
- Against Phaenippus
- Against Macartatus
- Against Leochares
- Against Stephanos 1-2
- Against Evergus and Mnesibulus
- Against Olympiodorus
- Against Timotheus
- Against Polycles
- On the Trierarcic Crown
- Against Callipus
- Against Nicostratus
- Against Conon
- Against Callicles
- Against Dionysodorus
- Against Eubulides
- Against Theocrines
- Against Neaera
This Ancient Greece related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it. |
- v
- t
- e